By: John S. Morlu II, CPA
The decision to structure a small business as a C corporation (C corp) or a pass-through entity (PTE) has long been a pivotal tax consideration. Since the Tax Reform Act of 1986 (1986 Act), this debate has evolved, influenced by changing tax laws and the differing advantages of these structures. Let’s explore the history, tax implications, and considerations that have shaped this ongoing discussion.
The Double-Taxation Dilemma
The 1986 Act fundamentally altered the tax landscape for corporations by eliminating the General Utilities doctrine, which previously allowed corporations to distribute appreciated property to shareholders without triggering taxable gains. This change introduced a significant drawback for C corporations: double taxation.
Here’s how double taxation works:
- A C corporation’s income is taxed at the corporate level.
- When profits are distributed to shareholders as dividends, those amounts are taxed again on the individual level.
This dual taxation system has been a major deterrent for small business owners. While dividend and capital gains tax rates have decreased since 1986, the concept of paying taxes twice remains unappealing to many entrepreneurs.
The Rise of Pass-Through Entities
In response, many small businesses have shifted away from the C corporation model, opting instead for pass-through entities (PTEs) like S corporations or LLCs taxed as partnerships or S corporations. Pass-through entities avoid double taxation by transferring income directly to owners, who report it on their personal tax returns.
Among PTEs, S corporations offer an additional advantage: avoiding self-employment (SE) taxes on income passed through as distributions. While LLC members may also qualify for similar treatment, this area of tax law is murky and has led to numerous court battles between taxpayers and regulators.
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA): A Game-Changer
The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017 added complexity to the entity selection debate. Two key changes significantly impacted the decision-making process for small business owners:
- Corporate Tax Rate Reduction: The TCJA lowered the corporate tax rate to a flat 21%, making it one of the lowest corporate rates in U.S. history.
- Qualified Business Income (QBI) Deduction: Section 199A introduced a deduction of up to 20% on eligible income for PTEs, effectively reducing the tax burden on pass-through income.
C Corporations Under the TCJA
The flat 21% corporate tax rate offers a compelling incentive for small businesses considering a C corporation structure. However, the double taxation effect still applies, as distributed dividends remain subject to individual tax rates. While the corporate rate is lower than most individual rates, the additional tax on dividends can negate some of the benefits.
Pass-Through Entities and the QBI Deduction
For PTEs, the QBI deduction effectively lowers the tax rate on eligible business income. For example, if a business owner qualifies for the full 20% deduction, their taxable income from the business is reduced, resulting in significant tax savings. However, understanding and qualifying for the QBI deduction can be complex, involving factors like the type of business, overall income level, and potential limitations.
Fringe Benefits: Another Factor to Consider
Beyond tax rates, the treatment of fringe benefits also influences entity selection. C corporations are more favorable when it comes to offering tax-favored benefits:
- Shareholder-employees of C corporations are treated like non-owner employees, allowing the corporation to deduct fringe benefits without taxing them to the shareholder.
- These benefits can include health insurance, retirement plan contributions, and certain other perks.
For PTEs, fringe benefits are treated differently:
- S corporation shareholders owning more than 2% must include the value of many fringe benefits in their W-2 income, making them taxable.
- Partnerships must treat fringe benefits as guaranteed payments, which are also taxable to the partners.
The TCJA further complicated fringe benefits by limiting deductions for certain perks, such as qualified transportation expenses, which were traditionally tax-deductible for employers.
The Modern Dilemma: C Corp or PTE?
The choice between a C corporation and a pass-through entity depends on several factors, including the owner’s goals, business type, and future plans. Here are some key considerations:
When a C Corporation Might Be Best
- Reinvesting Profits: If the business plans to reinvest most of its earnings rather than distribute them, the flat 21% tax rate can provide significant savings.
- Employee Benefits: Businesses looking to offer generous fringe benefits may find the C corporation structure advantageous.
- Scalability: C corporations are often better suited for businesses seeking outside investors or planning to go public.
When a Pass-Through Entity Might Be Best
- Minimizing Taxes: Avoiding double taxation and leveraging the QBI deduction can make PTEs more tax-efficient, especially for smaller businesses.
- Flexibility: LLCs, in particular, offer flexibility in how they are taxed and allow profits and losses to be allocated in non-traditional ways.
- Administrative Simplicity: PTEs often have fewer administrative requirements compared to C corporations.
Conclusion: Navigating the Debate
The decision to choose a C corporation or a pass-through entity is far from straightforward. While the TCJA introduced new opportunities for both structures, the trade-offs between lower corporate rates, double taxation, and the QBI deduction require careful analysis.
For small business owners, aligning the choice of entity with long-term goals—whether it’s maximizing tax efficiency, offering competitive benefits, or preparing for growth—is crucial. Consulting with a knowledgeable tax professional can make all the difference in making an informed decision that supports the business’s success.
Author: John S. Morlu II, CPA
John Morlu II, CPA, is the CEO and Chief Strategist of JS Morlu, a licensed public accounting and management consulting firm. He has more than 20 years of professional experience in auditing and advisory work, including service as Auditor General of Liberia and FAR and DCAA compliance work at Unisys Federal Systems.
The firm’s technology products include:
• ReckSoft (www.ReckSoft.com): AI-driven reconciliation software for financial accuracy and efficiency.
• FinovatePro (www.FinovatePro.com): Advanced cloud accounting solutions for growing businesses.
• Fixaars (www.fixaars.com): A global handyman platform for home and property services.